Home Disability Bill C-7 is a matter of life and death

Bill C-7 is a matter of life and death

by Dulcie McCallum
mccallum-estey-bill-c-7-is-a-matter-of-life-and-death
This content was published more than two years ago. Some information may no longer be current.

The value of Canada’s stock on the global human rights market is about to plummet. In what could be considered a perverse sense of timing, the volley between the House of Commons and the Senate on Bill C-7 — which proposes fundamental changes to criteria for medical aid in dying (MAiD) — coincides with the week that marks the eleven-year anniversary of Canada ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

As the special advisors to, and members of, Canada’s delegation to the United Nations when negotiating the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, we feel compelled to speak out because Canada is on the threshold of committing a serious legal breach. Prime Minister Trudeau needs to be aware that he is placing his reputation as a staunch supporter of human rights, both nationally and internationally, in serious jeopardy.

We write to remind the Prime Minister and his government of Canada’s international legal obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which our country has signed and ratified, along with our commitments under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the very bedrock of the whole United Nations system.

At the heart of these legal obligations is the right to equality and non-discrimination — which means, the right to the equal benefit and protection, before and under the law, without discrimination based on disability.

Bill C-7 would be in direct contravention of the legal obligations under the Convention, which guarantees people with disabilities the protection of the law on an equal basis with others. How? Because the bill allows for differential treatment based solely on disability by extending access to medical assistance in dying to persons with a disabling condition, but whose death is not reasonably foreseeable.

Bill C-7 will, if passed, make it entirely legal to end a person’s life simply because they have a disability. The fact that Parliamentarians cannot see that Bill C-7 turns the right to equality and non-discrimination on its head is of grave concern.

This legislative initiative reinforces negative stereotypes and perceptions about people who live with a disability or who are aging, giving us a law that is predicated on discriminatory and harmful ablest and ageist criteria. The legislative drafters have penned a cruel twist into the Criminal Code by deeming ease of access to medical assistance for people with a disability as a benefit.

We are not the first to warn the Prime Minister that this legislation is in direct contravention with international law. A cohort of UN Special Rapporteurs and experts have issued a global expression of alarm. Their statement, issued early this year, said in part; “Disability should never be a ground or justification to end someone’s life directly or indirectly.”

The international experts went on to make the specific point that if the law allows this differential treatment, it would “institutionalize and legally authorize ableism” in direct contravention of the Convention.

At stake is the very principle of equality and how it applies to persons with disabilities, a result that will have a long-term chilling effect. If you make a special case for applying different and discriminatory rules for people with disabilities in one instance, you will unleash a legal monster that has the potential to devour rights in other contexts.

Bill C-7 seeks to reformulate ‘death’ as a benefit but only for people with a disability or debilitating condition. The fear of history repeating itself lingers and so it ought to.  As disability rights activist Catherine Frazee puts it, Nothing about medically assisted death is ahistorical.”

The trio of international experts have posed three questions asking Canada to explain the pending breach of its international legal obligations. At the time of writing, Canada has not answered. Maybe while struggling to answer the experts’ questions, the government can ask itself one simple question: does it believe that the lives of Canadians with disabilities are worth less than others? 

Version français

Photo courtesy of Pixabay

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This means that you are free to reprint this article for any non-profit or for-profit purpose, so long as no changes are made, and proper attribution is provided. Note: Only text is covered by the Creative Commons license; images are not included. Please credit the authors and QUOI Media Group when you reprint this content. And if you let us know that you’ve used it, we’ll happily share it widely on our social media channels: quoi@quoimedia.com.

You may also like